A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
电影看完后很久，我左右顾盼了一会，发现自己两手空空什么都没有，却“不自量力”地和法比安以及他的朋友们处于一种何其相似的境地。那时候柏林的每一个角落都潜伏着毁灭，笔迹之下是思想和心灵，政治的号角在一片绿草地上吹响了，牺牲了。
为了ED加一星，故事毫无新意，人设和造型总有一种似曾相识之感，让我想起火影、死神还有其他好多动漫……
除了转换场景的动画和片尾预告和tv版好像一点儿区别也没有😂
混入历史影像与心理惊悚元素的剪辑风格在前半部分效果上佳，但随着进度条前进似乎越来越少
尼...玛...一定要这样子吗..不会游泳不要轻易下水...啊啊..尼玛..
默片画外音手提4:3抬升长镜头--回到过去--bird view--过去消逝了，希林这是抽了多少根室内烟，饥饿/偶遇/监视，“为什么不看着我”而镜头在凝视，这片看哭了
除了转换场景的动画和片尾预告和tv版好像一点儿区别也没有😂
Martin Eden -Undine-Fabian
国家大背景下的一场失恋
快速剪接的画面，身不由己地就被推着在历史的洪流中前进，那个荒诞的年代，有理想却不得志的人们，点燃生活的爱情却在现实中低头，Fabian最后走在树林里的那种雀跃，却最后迎来这样的结局，太爱Tom Schilling了！
蛮喜欢众柱现身，但是画风台词创意真比不上BLEACH。
前三分之一真的牛逼。文艺男青年的沉沦和魏玛共和国的堕落。
和峰的惬意午后🤭
在电影 也是尝试做到以现代 先锋 结构清晰的方法完成对魏玛时期的柏林的复刻//大概还是一些新浪潮的技巧实用 宛如上世纪五十年代的法国电影讲述一个男人的消亡 由人及史的视角还是很德国//仿佛评价佩措尔德的《过境》 历史的游魂从未离开过欧洲大陆
忍姐姐quq 三只豆豆眼小妹很有萌点，不得不说，炭治郎这个意志力，不愧是主角！
常常忘记汤姆希林已经是个成熟男人了。最后一个半小时的剧情和前半小时的试听一样好 但中间就有让人焦躁不安的一小时。但我也太为这样的故事着迷了 哎。
7/10 豆瓣简介里写的东西都没有看出来。我很敬佩导演的努力，但他也许更擅长拍TV，大银幕观众的体验他没有完全抓住，并不是镜头剪辑很乱很碎就体现了慌乱动荡。（关于手持镜头这事，我们得好好谈谈
一个九十年前（1931年）的德国魏玛共和国时代之浮世绘，传统的外表（4:3的画幅、古典的色彩光影，老式的布景、服道、歌曲舞蹈等）却与极现代感的电影表现手法、技艺奇异、令人炫目地结合了起来！做专业的同行们可以仔细看看。由于时间和历史的距离，虽然使我们不太能共鸣主角在乱世中的苦恼与挣扎，艺术上的新意还是值得体味。
之前下载一版先睹为快，但是没有声音，各种尝试未果，重新下载一版熟肉，在线也可以看，只是为了更清晰的截图，这样的电影🎦估计一遍不可能更理解。传统电影🎦画幅，还有各种镜头和对白的特色画外音融🈴了文学的特点。截图一遍硬盘投屏再一遍，多多益善。
那田蜘蛛山之后，休息休息调整调整的一部。故事也是主人公们怎么养伤，怎么得到进步的内容。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
