The history of Danish country church architecture is told by showing scenes of how the church was used by the congregation, beginning with the celebration of mass in a small and simple wooden church 800 years ago, and ending with the congregation singing in a village church of to-day. The development and the growth of the pattern of church architecture is shown.
Dreyer in this film shows a series of churches from different periods with churchgoers in period clothing. Each period is separated by a shot of a church bell double-exposed on the sky. Although the film has a vibrant and instructive way of communicating the different epochs and styles to students, it does not exhibit the artistic quality that usually distinguishes a Dreyer film, except perhaps in some of the costumes, which were originally made for Day of Wrath.
The board of Dansk Kulturfilm in autumn 1945 decided that their planned church film would exclusively be about village churches. Dreyer would rework the script that was written by editor and folk high-school principal Bernhard Jensen, aided by a committee of experts consisting of architect H. Lønborg-Jensen and Victor Hermansen, curator at the National Museum of Denmark. Dreyer had a first draft ready in mid-March, entitled Kirken er et gammelt Hus ("The Church Is an Old House"), which was distributed to the members of the committee for their comments.
In the last half of July, Dreyer and Victor Hermansen travelled the country to look at suitable churches. They researched the details and at Dreyer’s request a number of technical changes were made to the churches, including the removal of porcelain holders for electrical wiring in Tveje Merløse Church.
On 4 July, Dreyer went in advance to Ringkøbing. Shooting was set to start a few days later with the arrival of the director of photography, Preben Frank, who had fallen off a ladder and broken his leg, Fortunately, he was ready to cautiously start working again within a few days, with his leg in a cast.
Otherwise, the production went without a glitch. Everywhere, Dreyer said, they were well received at the vicarages and they had no problem getting enough extras. On 1 august, they returned to Copenhagen with almost all their footage in the can. They only needed to film the church in Skelby, where the weather had been against them, plus a Swedish wooden church in Hedared. The economy was distressed so soon after the war, especially when it came to foreign currency, but there were no real wooden churches left in Denmark and building an interior set in the studio would be too expensive.
The finished film was shown for the first time on 24 September 1947 to a small, closed circle, which included the Minister for Ecclesiastical Affairs. In December 1947, as was Dansk Kulturfilm’s standard practice, the film was presented to the press, politicians and others on a programme with four other short films.
人类的big bug是AI过度化后反被AI控制，成了AI的宠物甚至食物……
看预告的时候感觉就不会特别精彩，其实正片出来还好，能看下去
跟爱死机其中一集非常相似嘛 讽刺人工智能 讽刺人类自身 有点意思
非常单纯的“黑镜式”人工智能叛变故事，没怎么触及社会背景，也没太纠结人性阴暗，用热内一贯的荒诞恶趣味搭配儿童科幻级别的CG特效，乱炖出来这么个东西……拖沓是真拖沓，色调与运镜看着也是真舒服。
威尼斯主竞赛第十八场，及格水准的波兰历史电影。实在看不动了，最后3部主竞赛全都放弃。
脑洞真的很大，有很多可以思考和挖掘的地方。很多梗也好玩，比如2045年荷兰已经被淹了😅 还有未来世界的广告推送机制太可怕了，比现在还要密切地监视我们每一个人。成年人的感情真的没有孩子的纯粹，来得快走得也快… e三分剧情，两分制作！
我们就称之为串烧MV吧！没什么内容，情绪也不够，音乐也不太舒服，画面也只是糖水片。电影拍的还没素人vlog好看，单单是片头动画差点就被劝退。
执法部门滥用权力侵犯人权，操纵司法和检察机关进行伪造隐瞒，威逼利诱栽赃替罪羊，利用亲属的懦弱和对权力的恐惧瓦解抗争，当种种卑劣行径被针对到面前，当绝望无助的情绪一直环绕在身边，你还能坚守内心那一处微弱的正义么？光亮或许很难照进黑暗的现实，但主角在法庭上一遍又一遍地重复着那句最直白的真相证词时，我相信都在观众心里种下了一颗为正义反抗的种子。
不知所云 没有理工基础的对人工智能拙劣的想象
典型的日影，风景真的蛮美的，特别是航拍大海的几个镜头，节奏很慢，剧情也很无聊，但对明亮色调的画面毫无抵抗力。
一部用想象拍的科幻片，视觉UI和UX很有未来感，只是思考深度不够，算是一种警报吧，但是并不能让人思考如何正确对待和把握尺度。算是一种无病呻吟吧，可以不动脑子看看
足够幽默 足够怪诞 同时对人类与未来的命题有了更进一步的讨论
导演觉得很有趣，结果观众觉得冗长又无聊。机器人的大白牙真的很恶心。
比较典型的法国风格电影，脑洞还是挺大，可惜有爱死机玉珠在前，这个脑洞就差了点意思。整体感觉就是把短篇拉成了长篇，并没有更多的惊喜。
# 78 Venezia # 这是一部沉重，深刻，触目惊心的电影，虽然是发生在80年代的波兰，里面发生的事件以及司法程序都影射了当下的社会现实，区别是在电影中问题得到了解决，在现实中问题得到了掩盖
感觉拍的有点碎，大乱炖。但很有意思，值得一看。这样的居家机器人请给我来一打
设定还行，但是这种密闭空间的戏太考验剧情和调度了，剧情整体没有太大冲突点，主线是是AI和人类的矛盾的话又拍得太虚浮了。
即便人工足够智能，法国人还是要读诗、跳舞、调情、上床。全世界人类和人工智能大团结万岁！
这是今年目前为止看过的最难熬的电影，看了三次终于看完了。滨边美波我老婆，但整个戏太碎片散漫。
两星半。一个年轻男孩被民兵无辜打死，母亲寻获正义之路，却变成了波兰政府寻求稳定的绊脚石，周遭之人全部沦为牺牲品。这是一个特别值得讲述，且意义深刻的故事。但从电影拍摄角度，导演太不懂得情节的取舍和力量感的灌注了。心碎之感在冗长叙事中变得愈发无力，无论从作者性，还是商业性来看，都不是合理的做法。《冷战》男主托马斯·科特演的小反派，微妙的情感很值得玩味。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
