剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 钭康时 9小时前 :

    不主流的题材和大胆的立意,还这么有意思,能过审应该还是讨了《驴得水》那样“借古讽今”的巧……话剧味和结局的风格也很像《驴得水》,还好这次不太BE了。总之子墨真是又敢拍又会拍,完全值得五星支持一个!

  • 颖橘 3小时前 :

    小村庄夜战那段简直了,一看就是林超贤导演的手笔。炮兵、狙击手、机关枪手,扔手雷、近身肉搏,安排得环环相扣,节奏太好了。易烊千玺的扮相和特写也很精彩,没想到这么豁得出去。最后美军发现冻僵的志愿军尸体那里,虽然读书的时候看过这个情节,但还是被戳到了。

  • 邗凌香 9小时前 :

    特别震惊报告老板团队竟然拍出讽刺悬疑剧!有密室逃脱和民国剧本杀的元素,也致敬了《闪灵》和《这个杀手不太冷》用民国背景反讽当代,非常大胆,有勇气也有创意!喜剧人真的都是宝藏人!

  • 褚以彤 9小时前 :

    很幸运,我没有错过这部电影。

  • 雨静 9小时前 :

    长,但没必要。视觉观感很累,全片是高潮等于没有高潮。人物形象千篇一律,好像一提硬汉永远就只有这么几个人。总觉得可以更好的,看个纪录片都会哭但看电影完全没感觉。

  • 晨鸿 4小时前 :

    万里一个新兵在枪林弹雨里穿梭毫发无伤 难免让人觉得主角光环强大

  • 查明朗 6小时前 :

    整部影片就是通过简单的语言包袱、戏剧冲突和闪回解释堆叠而成,几乎不存在任何视觉化讲述方式,so,越文学、越戏剧,越不电影。

  • 洛海秋 0小时前 :

    近两年从金刚川,到1950,到长津湖。这次感触最深。外公也是19岁上的现场,也会怕疼,也会调皮,也会想家。

  • 繁宛凝 2小时前 :

    太惨烈了,我知道真实的战场只会比这更惨烈,珍惜今天的美好生活,致敬英雄们!

  • 郏琬莠 5小时前 :

    长时间的战争场面,看得人头昏脑胀是真的。但不否认这场战役的伟大,只不过作为艺术形式呈现,它还不够那么好

  • 桐玥 4小时前 :

    和男友第一次看的电影 最后十几分钟我俩都一起不想看了,都觉得一般,所以更觉得喜欢他了

  • 祁沐东 3小时前 :

    刘循子墨的处女作竟然还不错!演员选得便宜但也恰到好处。剧本作为类型片逻辑没问题,两个地方,一个是布景有浮光,不够真,一个是剧作小聪明(嘎吱乐)有点多,算是万合天宜的传统艺能。韩寒和万和关系还真是不错,很看好啊!

  • 第学智 4小时前 :

    05.12.2021 | @ Regal Rockville | 过誉了。作为剧本杀应该不算差,作为电影的话太小儿科了。如果像唐探一样走多一点搞笑风是不是会好一点。

  • 薇冰 6小时前 :

    作为剧本杀电影来说观感真的很差,东拼西凑的故事和故作姿态的表演,呈现出来是完全疏离的气息,就连最近世界观架空和置景虚幻廉价的《杀手》都更让观众觉得真实和自在。但就是这么一个支离破碎的非电影最后竟然还能被捏到了一起去,且凭借着大胆的讽刺力度让观众得以共情。政商娱三位一体的全面打击,一种直面黑暗的鲜血淋漓,结尾追光的艺术家打着游击只为真相已经很是感动,没想到还能更有希望,那一瞬间起了鸡皮疙瘩。。

  • 祁子议 6小时前 :

    先说缺点,在电影里有些片段有些刻意煽情,另外战斗场景不够真实,集体冲锋时候哪能搞这种密集冲锋,看得我都急死了。

  • 皮辰韦 1小时前 :

    终于看到了心心念念,期待已久的长津湖。无论场面,音效和特效都特别的棒,把抗美援朝这段波澜壮观的历史很好的呈现在观众面前。“没有冻不死的英雄,也没有打不死的英雄,有的只是军人的荣耀”,“如果我们不打这一仗,我们的下一代就要打,我希望我们的下一代能生活在一个没有硝烟的世界”,一句句台词震撼人心,引起共鸣。感谢前人的牺牲付出,才换来没有硝烟的和平年代。

  • 节心远 1小时前 :

    让我感动的不是演员,而是我联想到在几十年前有这么一群平凡而伟大的人为了我们的国家和下一代去浴血奋战,就会很感动。一想到他们牺牲在异国,就会格外心疼

  • 牟采白 2小时前 :

    以前一直不理解为什么他们宁愿放弃生命也要追求胜利,后来慢慢明白了,他们的背后是人民,他们的心中有信仰,他们敢于面对第一强国发起冲锋,只为建设自己理想的国家。

  • 菅长逸 7小时前 :

    有幸观看首映,且不说抗美援朝精神带来的感动和震撼,单说这部电影本身,观感非常非常爽,此前最为担心将近三个小时的时长会拖沓和让人疲惫,但176分钟看完绝对还是意犹未尽,甚至找不出任何尿点。必须说这是国产电影史上最牛逼的战争片,制作绝对不输任何国际大片。最棒的是战争戏,除了令人震撼的视觉效果和大场面之外,难得将节奏也拍得逻辑条理清楚收放自如,全程紧张握紧小手。陈凯歌把控的人物塑造也非常好,寥寥几笔主配角性格都塑造得非常生动,还有车厢外万里江山的浪漫,没有刻意煽情但赚足了眼泪。各位主演也都稳稳的。

  • 象玉泉 3小时前 :

    被单位强制着拉去组团看这部电影,虽然电影票报销,但是整个观看过程相当煎熬。居然一个多小时之后才真正开始出发到长津湖?难怪能拍这么冗长?易烊千玺饰演的伍万里三番五次闹脾气,这不是胡闹一样的吗?根本就体现不了一个少年的叛逆特点,反而觉得很尴尬。至于战争戏,能不能层次分明、适可而止?

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved