Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
原来低保户的贫富差距哪里都有呀，想起了很早的一个梗开着车去领低保
电影版为了让在一个真实的房间里或者面对面唱歌不那么尴尬，加上了很多特写镜头，演唱时不得不把声音降低，情感无法很强烈地表达出来。不知道为什么电影院的杜比音效反而让有些歌听起来刺耳？像Disney+上的 Hamilton 或者 Apple TV+ 上的 Come From Away 直接拍官摄比较好。
我后半段埃文的转折还是有点生硬。歌曲本身还是比较突出，其实真相前后的对比还是很讽刺吧
我不知道那些给差评的人是多冷漠。。这么好的一个片子还要评价电影效果，评价是否按原著拍出来。。真的够了。。这片子反应的很现实，看了心里特别不舒服。。也很能理解小干，在震后失去父母，只有惠姨和泰久相依为命。。使他又重新感到了温暖。。但现实社会很残酷。。我觉得这个片子应该在中国上映。。让国人有所警示，不要再继续让我们这个社会变得冷漠！残忍！每一个人都是应该存在的！不应该被无情淘汰！弱肉强食！那是动物！不是人！
看到一个小时才意识到不是小男孩是小女孩 还有日本福利工作人员是办成一个低保户会扣钱还是咋滴 这么不想给办
意识到了影院的感染力和电脑屏幕的不同，我在小荧幕看必无动于衷，但放在大荧幕上我还是挺能进入故事并共情的。但是这些歌的套路也太雷同了一点，旋律也没有记忆点，连洗脑都做不到作为音乐剧电影无疑是失败的。最大的毒点是男女主唱完only us说互相喜欢，然后东窗事发就没有然后了，还有更笨比的剧本吗？我以为起码有个重归于好，没想到整成相忘于江湖了，这个点能毒我三天。
康纳反而让我知道
我只是觉得Evan很creepy，甚至有成为连环杀手的潜质。
挺好的主题拍得这么没滋没味，最后半个钟头简直看不下去
新歌anonymous one…演唱者不是各种活动都参加的么 怎么适合唱这首歌…ben真的是不适合演高中生了 他也许想凭借这个冲奥 但是都是老歌新唱不会入围原歌吧？演技其实还可以 但是还是看起来有点老了…有评论提到电影里面的歌是原声不是录音室的 难怪为什么听起来和soundtrack专辑不同……另外强烈推荐苹果音乐类的电视剧LITTLE VOICE
3. 只有一起同甘共苦 見證生死過後方才見真情 而這有那部分的人自己才懂 也不需要其他人理解了
就很一般，日本人的那种办事效率和那种死要面子的精神应该是犟人精神了。
三星半吧，题材选的很好，但是节奏和叙事都不怎么出彩，悬疑感不足
极其boring，and歌巨难听，从头到尾十几首都一个调调。
"Dear Evan Hansen: Today is going to be an amazing day and here's why. Because, today, all you have to do is be yourself. But also confident. That's important. And interesting. Easy to talk to. Approachable. But mostly be yourself. That's the big, that's number one. Be yourself. Be true to yourself."
我觉得拍得挺好的啊不知道为啥评分这么低😂虽然实话实说，Ben Platt的脸真的演不了高中生了，甚至他只有27岁这件事都很难让人相信。不过说到演技唱功这些我觉得他表现一如既往的棒。个人认为的问题在于其他选角...我懂，电影版一定要明星来撑一撑的，但是Julianne Moore 最后唱So Big, So Small的时候我真的严重跳戏，还有她和Amy Adams同时出现时老让我以为自己在看The Woman in the Window...总的来说电影版依旧很好哭，音乐依旧棒，很喜欢结尾新加的那首A Little Closer
建议社会派推理放弃推理【你社会部分不是整挺好的嘛！
7分的音乐剧改编电影，中规中矩，歌很好听，想讲青少年抑郁、自杀问题，可惜没有很深入展开，似乎只是说多关注就好了，后面的故事也显得太轻，除了《You will be found》，其他真的看过就忘了
拍的一般，但抱着死政策做事的人 真的 也很讨厌
比我们想象中要更广阔
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
