Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
一直以为萌鸡小队是美国动画片，百度后才发现是国产的，我还是很欣喜的。因为电影故事完整结构清晰，人物性格鲜明，同时也具有一定的教育意义，是一部各方面都不错的儿童电影。影片为现代都市儿童刻画了一幅美丽的森林画卷，也生动描写了森林动物眼中的人类社会以及一部分人类对森林对大自然的破坏，在孩子们心中种下了向往森林、热爱自然的种子；故事中人人喊打的老鼠与萌鸡成为朋友并搬到森林的情节也温暖人心，教会了我们这些大人摘下有色眼镜平等待人。
能告诉我一下被反派改变了的未来到底哪不好嘛？
super hero landing，小亚当耍帅第一名！
大人和四岁的小孩都觉着是烂片，光荣吗😅看不到任何的真诚，只有为了圈钱的敷衍。一个个人物建模丑的要死，是十年前的水平吗😅人物建模各种重复使用，把观众当瞎子吗😅给七岁的小女孩做卧蚕成功的把小女孩变成七十岁的奶奶，开心吗😅片里的所有城市里的人都是瞎子，只有推动剧情发展的时候才有眼睛这个东西是吧😅如果说动画片有80分的话，这个动画电影我打-8。谢谢这个电影，让电影院里所有的大人和小孩都面无表情，坐立难安。
我从不懂科学，也从不理解它，超越了生死的不幸和黑洞，穿越的无奈与甜蜜，名为亚当，无法创世。
一直以为萌鸡小队是美国动画片，百度后才发现是国产的，我还是很欣喜的。因为电影故事完整结构清晰，人物性格鲜明，同时也具有一定的教育意义，是一部各方面都不错的儿童电影。影片为现代都市儿童刻画了一幅美丽的森林画卷，也生动描写了森林动物眼中的人类社会以及一部分人类对森林对大自然的破坏，在孩子们心中种下了向往森林、热爱自然的种子；故事中人人喊打的老鼠与萌鸡成为朋友并搬到森林的情节也温暖人心，教会了我们这些大人摘下有色眼镜平等待人。
充斥着老套的情节、笑点、转折，肖恩·利维现在就这水准吗？还不如去年的《失控玩家》。死侍嘴炮打得再好也是杯水车薪的贡献，本片还不如改成漫威多元宇宙混战，死侍vs绿巨人vs卡魔拉vs艾丽卡，是不是更有看头？
整体剧情简直是好莱坞套路教科书 只能给个及格分 不过小亚当选角很OK 加一星 瑞安近些年演技和选片风格都越发固化 这点有点可惜
三星半。时空穿越，科幻+家庭亲情片。漫威演员大杂烩，死侍卡魔拉绿巨人，没有办法的事，上漫威就是打开世界辨识度知名度，就会有片约。特效还是很不错的。两个不同年龄的儿子斗嘴挺有意思，两个儿子见父亲的玩棒球情节还是很温馨。个人而言超出网飞烂片预期
爆米花电影，中间夹着一些让你牺牲自己幸福去成全目标的误导，之后给你画个饼 让你以为牺牲了 来世还能幸福的潜意识误导
小贱贱和网飞这签的是包年不限流量吗？往死里用啊，要榨干的节奏。。看风评一般，某段文戏正准备开始快进，被小贱贱和儿时母亲的对话感动到，谁说小贱贱只会重复自己不断耍贱，人深情起来也可以很高司令。。亲情牌打得还行，小男孩不错。。
这个电影才是那种不需要刻意追求剧情逻辑的。感受穿搭的浓浓情感就好。后面爹地在亚当耳朵旁边一直重复的话疗简直心理医生附身，就差一个职业头衔了。
超级英雄合家欢 还行吧 大爱丛林中的房子 庭院也太棒了！
本意是科幻包裹下的内核亲情片, 却被拍成了比三流电视剧还要无聊, 冗长且毫无逻辑和危机感的拉家常.
看到 70% 左右就放棄去睡覺了，大概只有大亞當去酒吧跟他媽對話那邊較感動
还挺有意思的设定，如果展示一下2050的世界就更好了
我知道有些地方我应该感动、激动或者欢笑，但是真的做不到啊……
果然很扯，会飞的鸡，还是翅膀带着伤的？果然是小孩看的，不适合我这个22岁的大小孩看
Ryan Reynolds是一個風格走到底了麼⋯⋯我快要忍不了了🙄
还是少耍点嘴皮子，多改进一下剧本吧。Ryan Reynolds是只会演这种角色了？另外小孩子也这样说话只会让人觉得嘴欠，并不讨喜。可惜妈妈和Laura戏份不多。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
