性知识常识在线阅读 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 记录片 1990

导演: Simon Ludgate

剧情介绍

  This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
  THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
  Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
  As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .

评论:

  • 时沛儿 0小时前 :

    炒冷饭不是个好习惯。偶尔将就一下可以,当正餐就算了。开头那些枪法是什么意思?这么近都打不着,故意的吗?

  • 吕鸿远 0小时前 :

    肉眼可见的“导演告诉观众我真的不想拍这一部你们将就看一下就好了”,很多关键角色都被省略或替代,加上时不时闪回的镜头,直接破坏了回忆和现有叙事,当然,最主要还是故事的讲述和动作的设计上相比三部曲没有新意了,更多是给情怀影迷的一种安慰大餐吧。

  • 六清馨 4小时前 :

    如果给你一次选择的机会,你有没有勇气醒来面对这个世界

  • 仁霞雰 7小时前 :

    其实知道是华纳的任务,拉娜•沃卓斯基泯然众人。没有哲学和谜语人台词,通篇的玩梗与泄愤活成了老愤青,新角色没有一丝记忆点,老角色换人重启更是灾难,蜂群战术早就被速8和《釜山行》玩明白了,子弹时间无聊到变成普通慢镜头。4不过是用新技术翻新了特效,唯一能庆幸的只有尼奥与崔妮蒂这俩主心骨角色的续写没给一块玩砸,摆烂但没完全摆烂,没沦落成另一个《变形金刚5》。

  • 屠宛亦 8小时前 :

    官方自制佳片有约,当年的核心主创悉数到场,让我们回味经典,再续前缘

  • 塞文墨 0小时前 :

    可能是我这几年最喜欢的电影。倒不是拍的有多好,只是特别适合。

  • 库向南 8小时前 :

    how dare lana wochowski did the action coordinator job herself!!!!!!!!!!!! how!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 全片打斗声音和动作配不上,动作和动作也配不上!!!!剧本本身也不算差吧,剧情台词都在点子上,,毕竟沃卓斯基写剧本搞哲学思辨的水平还是可以的,而且黑客帝国,自由意志之类的概念完全不过时。但是整体的效果真的不太对,尤其是过多的插入了前三部的回放,(再加上过于自嘲的台词)不知道的人以为你拍纪录片将如何搞砸黑客帝国重启呢!!!想要拉拢老粉也要讲究基本法啊!!!不看抓心挠肝,看了后会,我宁愿这部片子没拍过。

  • 初雯 5小时前 :

    复活男女主的设定勉强能接受吧,女主飞翔救男主也很拉好感(“你不能管管她吗”?不能啊哈哈哈哈哈!),但最后结局???

  • 哲骞 2小时前 :

    21年后拉娜成了键盘侠,用这部电影恶狠狠吐槽了她早已掉队的次世代网络,极度嫌恶地彻底拆解了曾经耗尽心力拼搭起来的母体积木,所剩的只看了个寂寞

  • 令景福 5小时前 :

    真的不考虑情人节上映吗(笑)千万不要孤立看它,千万不能把它和123分开,4完全就是对123的无奈解构和有限重构。分数扑街叙事破绽百出又怎样,我就是喜欢。

  • 利涵桃 0小时前 :

    几乎把大IP拍续作能抄的套路能踩的雷区一个不落全整上了,但是导演在电影一开头就替粉丝把能吐的槽全吐了,让人出了影院骂无可骂,真是相当鸡贼

  • 初恬默 3小时前 :

    千言万语抵不过一句,何必呢[心碎]

  • 安春雪 6小时前 :

    给中年粉丝的大礼。情深款款。感受到中年人的爱。

  • 延元瑶 1小时前 :

    你知道我们最爱的华纳母公司决定给三部曲制作一部续集,而他们通知我无论我们是否参与他们都会启动这个项目。

  • 台幻翠 6小时前 :

    在原3部曲已经完美闭环的基础上,要不破坏原著又要重启故事,并且科技已经发展到现今这个程度,确实难度不小。华纳也是疯批了,重启这个项目还给这么大的预算,烧钱程度可以和复联媲美,在全球疫情大大影响票房的环境下,不知是对2位年老色衰的主演号召力太有信心,还是对这个项目太有信心。蛮好的一个故事,但拍的七零八落的,靠故事解读才能理解。基努甚至连John Wick过来的造型都懒得换一下。

  • 希涵瑶 1小时前 :

    而很多人很难相信这种信念,换句话说,他们也不想体验这奢侈的浪漫

  • 卫昉宽 5小时前 :

    故事架构,如果《黑客帝国1》是黯然销魂蛋炒饭,这部就是隔夜饭炒蛋。//探讨深度,如果三部曲探讨的是:我是谁,从哪来,到哪去。那这部就是:去就去,去尼玛。//动作戏,没了高人的加持,就直接用七龙珠冲击波完事了。//如果只能改一处来“挽救”剧本,我会在结尾三人对峙之时,加入一个在桌上旋转的陀螺。

  • 初凡 3小时前 :

    (1.0/10)一星的续集电影,五星的后现代行为艺术,观看过程欢快得飞起。华纳居然会把这片放出来没有大规模重拍也是迷惑。拉娜带着一队主创时时刻刻把“我们不想拍,但是我们做不了主啊”挂在脸上。当初是谁推动着立项来着。这片的鉴赏电影工作者是做不了了,交给文化研究人士吧。

  • 勇华 6小时前 :

    好吧,没有人机大战,还是人人大战,重生系统之间又打架,不痛不痒,这种隔靴搔痒的感觉太熟悉了。但是trinity比the one会飞,够女权。

  • 咸弘和 9小时前 :

    I never believed I was The One. But she did. She believed in me. It's my turn to believe in her.

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved