Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
明明是一部灾难片，却让人哭了又笑笑了又哭。
超级大烂片，前段冗长无趣，中段荒诞，尾声强行煽情得救，浪费我生命两个小时
我看完了。我真是脸盲，Dakota 就是《恰恰丝滑》里的那位，那里面的演技真好呀。没想到还演过《五十度灰》...
奥斯汀的作品，18世纪的英格兰，贵族家庭主要人物居然集齐了所有肤色人种，果然是2022魔幻美式zz正确，左派渗透文艺作品的极大胜利。奈何原著底子实在太好，英国乡村太美，再怎样魔幻仍不失为佳作。
不得不感叹，韩国电影工业的领先，拍个商业烂片都比国产的好那么多
达科塔约翰逊毫无古典气质，改编现代至此不如放弃摄政时代搬到21世纪，大概制作组也知道简奥斯汀的古偶有着与现代并不适配的狗血风味。甚至不如爱玛。
虽然剧本很俗 但演员自带喜感 车婶到哪里都是厨子hhh
2.5分，非常勉强地向上取整，女主不停地对镜头做jim face实在有些看不过眼，好歹影片的妆发以及摄影非常到位，强力挽尊。
给了green submariner好多镜头，有意无意的……
优缺点都很明显的灾难喜剧片。
有点头重脚轻。一开始男主深情的眼神就明显显示了他还爱着安，所以就猜得到结局。所以整个剧情给我的感觉就是，女主因为家里人劝导说男主太穷了没地位不要嫁，所以真的拒绝了男主，然后又后悔了8年，也没谈新的恋爱家里人感觉也没催？男主一个人在外面奋斗了8年，也深情不忘，等到混出名堂了才敢回来。然后女主家里人对他就看重了，然后就支持他们在一起了。然后女主又去找男主，中间差点经历一个误会，最后在一起了。完结撒花。
女主很美，风景很美，只是，这个故事和简奥斯丁没有半毛线关系……竟然还有旁白……
谁写的这剧本啊，即生硬又刻意，太出戏没法看。
没有英国脸的人拍英国古装剧怎么看怎么别扭，而且这电影里的男的都长的什么歪瓜裂枣，找不到男演员了吗？？
蛮标新立异的，舞台感很强，服装设计很花心思，确实反应了这个时代而非还原十九世纪当时的感觉
不能说和原著毫无关系，但是看着就像是一位美国21世纪的大学生来到了英国一个奥斯汀主题乐园，与众人玩起了cosplay，且挑选了一个木头来扮演男主。与其变成这种不伦不类的改编，还不如索性从一开始就颠覆原著，做一个完全现代的版本。
网飞别翻拍英剧蹭原著了吧。太用力了，好像一群现代人穿着当年的衣服别扭地“演”下去。达妹的脸也让人出戏，可能编剧是想把她塑造成另一个伊丽莎白吧，但是非常离谱地失败了。不好看，男主长得也有点丑，当下饭剧也好出戏，没有那种感觉，劝退！！
故事一般，父亲死了去继承遗产连墓地都不去看一眼？父子关系、和女主的微妙情感原本可以很好的串联，却毁在了杂乱无序，好在呆梨的风光和奶酪令人无法抗拒，就当舌尖上的托斯卡纳来看吧~ PS，原来欧洲人也会吃鸽子。。
感觉有头没尾…保住生命以后大概是一场纠纷吧💔
拉一下平均分，虽然喜不喜，悲不悲，平平的一部电影。在疫情下，韩国电影很久不更新了，希望整个电影业能够快速复苏，也希望世界恢复原有的样子。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
