A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
后面女主的复仇就显得有点多余，就在揭露真相的时候戛然而止更好
展示了一位人神共愤的女主角及其应得的现世报之后 电影本来可以在这里优雅地结束了 但显然网大作者并没有这样的觉悟
希区柯克《后窗》既视感 其实不难猜到结尾 看到一半已经猜到了 本以为有二次反转的 刘羽承好好看哦 女主身材太棒惹🐻好大
这么好的题材能拍成这样，美国人真的好土 （刘承羽和悉尼我可以！
如果打砸时候发现了真实证据就太牛了，现代行为艺术
可是就是片子中前段智商和片尾完全不是一个人
故事非常完整，好于以往任何类似情节的片子。女主演技一流。
其实是女主又当又立的戏码罢了
还把男朋友的自杀
这个剧情简介驴头不对马嘴啊，完全不是同一个故事啊，怎么没人修正？故事还可以，虽然有很破绽，当悬疑片看还是有些意思。
故事还算吸引人，但为了强推剧情而产生的bug有点多，反转也基本能想到，多一颗星给Pippa的身材。
胸是最大的卖点，因此选角的。然后是反转加反转，电影寓意在对白中也传递出去了。
大浪淘沙里的一粒沙子。两个小时里我要靠火辣的身材来刺激自己来保持注意力。
反转还是挺精彩的，但是后续处理乏力，刻意制造的冲突效果不太合理
符合一贯的法式电影色彩审美，雨果说“破晓时分，田野发白的时候，我将去看你”
真可惜，如果没有最后那个降b格的反转可以打四星的，整个气质都被这“zz正确”给破坏。不得不说偷窥确实会让人上瘾，每个人都有窥探别人隐私的癖好，行动上语言上或多或少都有点，本片就直戳每个人内心的阴暗面，你在凝视深渊的时候深渊也在凝视你。ps不得不说女主是真的好看，这身材太完美了，莱莱形状和粉嫩度简直了，本片就看这个也够了。
当它有那么一点儿意思的时候 它已经要结束了
还蛮好看的。结局的反转我真是瞠目结舌。偷窥竟然被下套，计中计。除了摄影师那对夫妇本身就让人憎恨之外（毕竟拿人的生命开玩笑），女主也是让人很讨厌啊，说白了一开始就迷恋于摄影师的肌肉和床上功夫，要不是有男友在，早就出轨了吧？本来就是渣女。所以这部电影中根本就没有什么好男好女，男的心狠手辣，女的渣的还很歹毒。
结尾的“反杀”确实是有点画蛇添足，交代太短甚至有点魔幻了（偷师美恐草草收尾的传统艺能？）。首尾两个互相呼应的暗示观众做为“voyeurs”的镜头很巧妙。高潮那段戏，嗯....很精彩，懂得都懂。
非常惊艳、劲爆的表演，峰回路转的剧情令人欲罢不能；刘承羽的出演华丽且迷人；偷窥、窃听及通讯的手法具备新颖性和创造性，科技含量十足。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
