Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
Goodbye and good luck to you~~
好像看现场啊。完全想不到的切入点，演员都演得非常棒。尤其女机长独唱那一段，太励志了。
非常好看的小品式电影，两人一室，对话支撑情节，两位主演优雅的气质让一场令人不齿的性交易变得浪漫充满了趣味。相互救赎的好莱坞烂俗桥段，却是建立在一场性交易的设定让电影有了新意，这部电影的核心表达依然是快感是一种力量，把自己的快感握在自己手里，可以带来非常解放的人生体验。
感觉看了一篇音乐剧版的特稿，关于信仰的小段落最打动我
蛤蟆先生去找心理医生，心理医生也找蛤蟆先生。能理解剧本想法but too cliché，人物想法变化前后衔接不太自然，比较惊讶的是Emma Thompson的出镜，还是好美。
很喜欢对性的探讨，是Fleabag以后最喜欢的了！第三次会面谈到妈妈稍微有点过，第四次真好。
此刻，enjoy the pleasure 足矣
find you pleasure and enjoy it❤️
题材和表演都很强。以为只是打擦边球。没想到亮点在最后。
完美剧作！作为中国女性，恐怕直面真实的欲望的那一天，还远远没有到来！所以更显这部电影的可贵！年度十佳！
太棒了，希望以后歌舞剧作都能慢慢放出官摄电影！！
这调度也太牛逼了吧，一群人几张椅子几件衣服讲述一个5天里元素多到爆的故事，期待改成迷你剧
有深度有温度，节奏很好。编剧厉害，老妇少男的性事没有让人反感，只有美好。导演加分，在封闭空间里只通过两位演员不停的聊天，却能一直抓住观众的注意力，这是本事。演员厉害，男女主充满魅力与自信，松弛的表演让人欲罢不能。但从社会意义上讲害人不浅，少儿不宜。 2022·6·27 8.4/1.3万。短评6061条 %86/11/3 【IMDb 7.1/4700 全球票房29.16万美元】
艾玛阿姨最后对自己身子坦诚的一笑，太美了
2019去西区没有看这部，第二年中国巡演取消，听了两年Me and the Sky，第三年终于等来官摄😭
导演敢拍宗教女教师召妓，豆瓣却容不下男妓二字，也是很讽刺
2021M79/9.0 善意就是哲学最终的那个点
讨论话题可以，但是Leo这个角色实在是过于Sex Saint，上一次看到现实反差这么大的角色还是爱很美味的健身教练。
Something has changed, something has remained, something we lost, something we gained, while something we've never truly learned… Peace&love或许可笑，但它存在过，也将一直存在。
太棒了！演技全程在线，当对情感状态和人物心理不甚理解时，剧情表现会一次次让你感到意外和牛逼，多理想主义的关系，多感人的交流，我们都需要对自己进行回顾和突破，最好的自己可能是自己想象不到的模样
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
