Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
在电影院看的时候打斗情节还是相当震撼的，不过就剧情缓解薄弱也是没办法的
单说电影本身，主角的演技并不能很容易的将我带入情绪，至少在前三分之二的内容里我还在分析推测后面的剧情，和我妈阐述我觉得不合理的地方，但是考虑到是小成本的电影，环境布景做的还是挺好的。
清河太可怜啦，那么多年一直被坏人虐待折磨，听到哨声就为了傻傻等待姐姐，痛苦的活着，期间还被姐姐伤害，直到后来抱着姐姐痛哭和救完小孩，那一声嘶哑的“姐姐”，相信所有观众都听得撕心难受。🥺电影方方面面都没毛病啊，为啥分这么低？
福建人导演的怪兽电影[捂脸]能好看吗，连模型都没做好，大陆还是老老实实拍红片吧
冲着女主给四星，氛围营造和层层推进拍的不错，故事也有可看性，村民各种酱油角色也演的不错。国产恐怖剧小成本制作来说属于上品了，相对第一部来说情节和特效都有很大程度长进，而且女主在戏里面的造型非常好看，虽然演员可能正常情况没这么惊艳。抓水怪时候的机关设置也不错，用心了。
不要看评论，直接去看，挺好看的！特效还行，剧情很感人！我都哭了，就够了。
及格热血番？我此前对这个番完全不了解…就感觉还行吧
村长秘密森林制毒，用水怪打掩护，故事还是蛮有新意的，拍摄的手法还需要再提高，摄影的角度，音乐的烘托，紧张悬疑的氛围都可以再上几个台阶。
bug还是有不少，打雷下雨也太频繁，但是剧作和观众喜好把握挺花了一番心思，在网大里面还算不错的。
导演想拍一些优质的艺术性的镜头然而没那个能力。走剧情的镜头也经常上下文连的莫名其妙。女主穿旗袍破案选择性解剖。。你穿个马裤不方便的多？女主都摸到坏蛋老巢了村民没一个跟着，拜托你们娃都在这呢一点都不着急吗？所有的“反转”都可以猜到……无趣。
虽然BUG不少，不过在国产片里算能看的了。
鬼怪说到底更是人心作祟，怪不可怕，人心的丑陋与险恶才是深渊与炼狱。
披着恐怖片的皮，其实是禁毒亲情片。
后半段看哭了我居然。清河把骨笛交给姐姐，记忆中的姐姐说，听到这个就是姐姐叫你回家。可是，再也回不去了。
其实抛开”建国后不许成精“的强行解释不谈，这部电影在剧情设计上是很有看头的，汇集了恐怖、侦探、悬疑的诸多元素，村长作为最终BOSS的跳反也算是既有反转又能自圆其说，但问题在于这电影的剪辑师恐怕是抖音上找的剪辑兼职的学员，整个剧情被剪得稀碎，很多剧情片段的衔接虽然不能说是很突兀，但就是让人频繁跳戏，观感极差！
场景和色调相当出色，演员也算上乘，在小制作里实属优秀
不反感
三星半，很套路的剧本，看的出来想做成好莱坞那种公路片的风格，骨头社作画打斗还是一如既往的强
还是喜欢TV版，映画版的故事过于俗套，热血也不够，毕竟王道漫画还是需要长久剧情进行铺垫的。
水猴子时间，水猴子大电影拍续集了哈，不是水猴子，其实这是南方的一种遗传病。好，下次攒一波水猴子再给大家鉴定🐵
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
