Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
感觉情节还可以啊，没那么不堪。只是最后女主的一些反应有点假
到最后我也没分清楚两个女主，然后这个故事真的又俗气，拍的又做作。
是寂寞，还是欲望得不到满足？人们都不开心，历史在覆灭，没有人关心未来。香艳镜头很多，影片本身尺度不大；温贞菱的演技很有突破，但一看就不会抽烟。
所以说 警察是坏人 很多警察都是伪装成正义使者的坏人 坏透了 因为掌握了规则 因为拥有便利为所欲为 最终 坏人赚得盆满钵满 凸(艹皿艹 ) 这个剧是翻拍的 怪不得我觉得眼熟
前段剧情的铺垫、紧张、悬疑氛围的营造都还不错，就是后面结束略草草。
感觉一般般，法国的监控太不行了，连车牌都拍不清楚。棺材上的钉子也太不紧了，一根鞋带就能拔出。
为什么这么低分，风景很美，故事也很好，虽然有点bug，但不影响进度，最后凶手原来是他。。。真沒想到
Sadly，Queen B变成了“绝望主妇”。与此同时，英国男人依然在美国电影里继续扮演着渣男角色
怎么说了，看了40来分钟，开始感觉像《宿醉》，又有点《遗弃》的味道，但是在看不下去了
2022.4.**闺蜜和老公出轨，闺蜜被老公杀了
Blair long time no see
不想一个人，最后都是一个人，越想要的越得不到。
最大輸家 莫過於那個警察 想偷吃女 沒吃到 還跌個狗吃屎 然後就摔死了
这不是台湾电影的风格啊
前半段跟韩国版基本照搬 后半段收的有点仓促
这是一部全是bug。还暗戳戳加了很多私心的烂片
听说韩版更好看 但这部依然值得5颗星 爽片
讲欲望和孤独吧，不想“一个人”，和“不想”一个人。
怎么说了，看了40来分钟，开始感觉像《宿醉》，又有点《遗弃》的味道，但是在看不下去了
结局有点潦草，想不通有视频竟然还能认错凶手，觉得是为了反转而反转。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
