Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
夏天会过去。 戳爷的瞳孔颜色太好看了
开头无论是内容还是色调，还是男主的脸我都很喜欢。看着看着放佛也感同身受到男主孤立无援的感觉、no friends no lover no family，还好奶奶一直支持着他。这漫长的等待审判的三个月。
新人导演讲述自己的故事还挺真诚的。怼脸拍把戳拍得美美的，感觉以后可以专门找这个导演拍MV...（剧情就算了，男人靠得住母猪也上树啊）
戳爷的颜值撑起了整部电影的看点 剧情反套路 值得信任的感情真的很少
只能講整體風格唔係我鐘意嘅，偏向The end of the fvcking world 嘅頹廢感，特別接受不能男主嘅style. 睇完comments 或者呢個係troye 嘅本色演出？dun know….不過拋開表面嘅頹廢生活，男主嘅遭遇以及果種缺乏安全感嘅內心的確幾令人同情，或者呢個會令到唔少現實中嘅Gay特別係btm 會有身同感受？ Anyway 最後結局得知原來troye 呢個角色係top 應該係相對出乎我意料之外嘅點了
蛮可爱的，但是每次看到美国青少年什么东西都往床上扔我就很抓狂
"and fuck you for making me like Taylor Swift"
我一直认为她不是一个好的母亲，原来只是她不够爱我。
比起《爱牵手》有过之不及。结尾换成崭新白鞋挺有意思，同时cliché着…开头的动画真的已经太太太过时太太太cliché了.完美的race balance
男二就是个印度版的杰克吉伦哈尔…完全是我的菜，想看他演哈利波特…拉拉朋友也完全是我的菜，小麦色的厚嘴唇亚裔美女…所以剧情稀烂我也能看得十分开心
本片很有戳爷的范，我怀疑是他为自己量身定做，影片中处处有戳爷现实中的影子。印度小子利用Caleb来暂时消除等待检测结果的的焦虑，利用完毕直接丢开，哼！Caleb也许真是心里或多或少知道Estha并不是真正喜欢自己，还要不顾一切给予对方安慰，结果被辜负，惨！最后戳爷的近景他好像表现得有点无奈和委屈，推断检测结果并不理想-个人看法。
我们每个人都在和原生纠缠，都渴望爱与被爱，却也同样经历期待、自我怀疑、懊悔、不甘、遮遮掩掩地面对和逃避，甚至被遗弃，但最后都不约而同地选择了重新来过，即使不能装作什么事都没有发生过，就像是一种脱口大骂的宿命。
3.5/5 我戳本色演出吗？真的是很小清新了。
Ins滤镜调色长篇MV式青少年多元性取向自我认同及HIV感染者心理抗逆力成长公益宣传片。。。
夏天会过去。 戳爷的瞳孔颜色太好看了
青春喜剧的风格却包含着伤痛文学的痛点，那些年少的岁月似乎我们经常会感觉到所有人都离开了我，然后又忽然间发现，哦，也有很多人爱我。画面很治愈，troye很可爱。
I’m so tired of waiting.
集结了小清新元素的电影，戳爷在欧美人里的颜里的确显小，整部的色彩还是挺明亮的，喜欢
我骑着双人单车，后座有时也会空落落的。你，我的好友。会选择与我同行么？
太适合周末的晚上看的美式小清新（如果白天看多少有点浪费时间）
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
