A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
看到的第一部关于新冠的剧情电影，比新闻更直观地感受护理人员的痛。
it is about helpless,not help.
女主最后一段在警车里冲着那些警察说的话，是对现今英国政府的痛斥。
我烦请那些短评榜的阴阳怪气的反思怪们，好好的“独立思考”一下，此片固然是敢揭短批判的”说实话“，我们的主旋律就不是“讲实话”了？、
还是老一套的个人微观角度进行剖析，批判和反思也很直白、具体、有力。
一堆Scousers里只有Jodie说话最好听
噩运骤然来袭，在彼时人们的面前，尤其是对前线医护工作人员而言，是一种未知的、庞然的恐惧。更甚者，上层讳莫如深，底层奉为牺牲。阴暗也好，残酷也罢。都是无可奈何的事。文学改编或者影视化呈现，应该更加实事求是。一次群体的疾苦，是已然造成的摧残事件，用人们的创伤去歌功颂德，是对遭殃人群的漠视与冷血。或许是因为本片中运用的长镜头及低鸣压抑的配乐，多次令人联想起《女人的碎片》，同样有一种莫名的怏然之感。沉默、苍白。｜7.0
前面五颗星，后面两颗星。情节推进到带着男子逃走太过于刻意了。倘若情节推动到了，倒也是能接受。假如到最后男子得到了适当的安置却忘了她，我觉得主题会更深刻一些。喜欢这里面的一些镜头语言。
别国拍的东西在反思不足，我国拍的东西企图叫观众感恩戴德。永远讨厌宏大叙事，因为“人”会被忽略。永远可以对Jodie Comer的演技有信心，即使没有脸部出镜只有声音的那段，角色满满的焦虑都从屏幕里溢出来。但最后出走的情节真的有些跳脱。
拒绝煽情，不需要宏大的叙事，只需要简单真实的讲述这件事 中间一段长镜头很窒息，朱迪演得仿若真实体验
1.以人为切入点，讲述疫情。而不是一种歌功颂德的姿态，搞一些伪人文关怀。
还有人在提醒你我们曾经度过的可怕岁月，提醒你记住，记住社会体制的所作所为。
被遗忘的他们，or被选择性抛弃（战略性放弃？）的疗养院，我们习惯了feel sorry for them unlucky people，但却没有付诸行动。
如何在年老体衰 生活不能自理的时候 还能获得有尊严的生活 太难了 这个社会对于老年人的临终岁月 总是缺乏足够的尊重 毕竟生命的消亡是一种损耗 不像新生 充满希望 还是希望老年的自己能走得体面点 更多的临终关怀可以早点合法引进国内
2.好人和坏人，都是出于自己的心理诉求和物质诉求。女主作为一个好的护工，是某种层面上的失败者，在这样的环境下能够收获被需求感。
前半小时跟拍女主进入疗养院，结识47岁便患有阿尔兹海默症的男主。
拍得不伦不类，多少有点自以为是了，结尾再扣一星，但立意是好的。“兔子”永远保有着一些敏感点，却永远不会想要做一个脱敏手术。这部电影于我而言是场糟糕的脱敏手术，但至少是种态度。
如何在年老体衰 生活不能自理的时候 还能获得有尊严的生活 太难了 这个社会对于老年人的临终岁月 总是缺乏足够的尊重 毕竟生命的消亡是一种损耗 不像新生 充满希望 还是希望老年的自己能走得体面点 更多的临终关怀可以早点合法引进国内
这是我看的第一部新冠相关题材的影剧，片中许多的片段，都让人回想起两年前新冠爆发时，亲历过的恐惧和无奈的心境。西方百姓对疾病防控的认知和我们并没有大不同，只是他们更关注「个人」而不是「国家」罢了。
演技真好
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
