Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
即角色一次出清的太快，让后面的部分失掉了不可预见性，胃口就吊不起来了。
电影院里的眼泪
却看得津津有味哈哈大笑，
逃离家庭的女人，抛弃女儿的母亲，平静悠闲的假期因为吵闹的闯入者卷起思绪风暴，难以启齿的身份在翻涌的回忆中逐渐拼凑完整。莱达从互为镜像的妮娜身上看到了与自己年轻时相似的经历，以旁观者视角观察他人生活，又在每个恍惚失神的片刻投射到内心世界，时空穿梭，频繁闪回，浮露秘密往事，撕开创伤记忆，那些集喜爱和厌恶、无私和自私于一体的复杂情感全都无所藏匿。“母职”是一条无形锁链，成为传统社会所认可的完美母亲意味着割舍自我人格，失去存在价值，心甘情愿地牺牲青春，毫无怨言地奉献自己，这是所有女性面临的窒息困境，莱达勇敢地跳出了桎梏，却仍要在痛苦自责中承受选择的后果。本片有费兰特的原著小说打底，文本上自然不会差，玛吉·吉伦哈尔完成了她稚嫩的导演处女作，科尔曼出色的表演完全值得提名，首尾呼应的配乐《Leda》加分。
血浆，黑色幽默都有了，但节奏不好……随意差点意思……可惜了题材其实还蛮有意思
剧情有些矫揉造作，前段女主一直哭还以为她女儿遭遇什么不测了，最后原来是把女儿微信屏蔽了。
年度爽片，重口味暴力血腥+各种黑色幽默嘲讽吐槽，好high呀！剧本99分，减1分给闹米明明扎了男主脚面一刀，然后…编剧也被剧情爽到顾不上了？
网飞挪威分部出品质量还不错，以传统黑色喜剧文本为底板，喷薄的血浆与恶趣味转折相得益彰，对戏内导演与演员身份的戏谑性解构饶富趣味，也是创新之处，可惜仅限开头和结尾。
黑色幽默和屎尿屁的魔幻反应，欢乐沙雕和血浆的神奇火花。没什么野心，导演只想玩的开心，今年最有趣的R级片。
冰血暴+逃狱三王？编剧应该是科恩粉。血浆用量达到B级实在没必要，但挺多小细节特别好，让拼凑和巧合不那么生硬。艹蛋的婚姻不重要，相爱相杀之后还得同舟共济。日出还是日落不重要，日子就是一天一天的过，这才是真正的冷幽默。
充分說明面對婚姻中年危機不用非去探討出點什麼，巧合劇本也不用太邏輯嚴密，快速入題大量血腥爽快的打鬥戲不拖沓不墨跡，就可以讓人一直看下來。三星半有的
作为玛吉的导演处女作，视听是真的不错。加上改编自费兰特的原著，总体品质确实相当可以。但几处实在太过刻意，反而令人略微反感，而且直接在电影里谈论文学性真的挺做作的。结尾有些莫名，看不懂。相比《女人的碎片》又是另一种维度的无解。有没有孩子似乎女人都是碎片，要拾起完整的自我必须舍弃太多的东西。追求自我实现（和享受人生）和家庭责任之间有着不可调和的矛盾。当然这些也并无新意，势必是要不断重复的母题。孩子们都是魔鬼吧。
刚开始的反转夫妻互杀还有点意思，后来一致对外血浆横飞了就比较中规中矩了，反而是最后的结局最好玩。
哈哈哈，来自北欧的黑色幽默还是一如既往啊，人渣夫妻的救赎，只是可惜了男主的老父亲，一团烂泥里的唯一莲花，好人死的可惜了……一段失败的爱情想要恢复光彩需要些什么呢?
低配史密斯夫妇林中小屋大战逃狱三王，CULT范儿正，黑色幽默范儿足，贼过瘾。仔细看看光头男主原来是另一大爽片猎头游戏里的男主之一。
哈哈哈，来自北欧的黑色幽默还是一如既往啊，人渣夫妻的救赎，只是可惜了男主的老父亲，一团烂泥里的唯一莲花，好人死的可惜了……一段失败的爱情想要恢复光彩需要些什么呢?
成人喜剧的皮，血浆片的底子。血浆版史密斯夫妇的评价不妥当，夫妻互杀戏被简化得太厉害，越狱犯入侵的重头戏却过于饱满，填塞了很多撑时间的无聊戏份。日后有翻拍版请务必把血浆和笔墨用在夫妻对手戏上。
堪称史上最怂男主，槽点不要太多，急死人！！！！
彪悍夫妇笨贼大乱斗，虽然叙事用了最常规的手法，中规中矩，但可靠性还行。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
