You are never fully liberated from Auschwitz, 11 July 2016 Author: Red-125 from Upstate New York The French movie "À la vie" was shown in the U.S. with the translated title "To Life (2014)." It was written and directed by Jean-Jacques Zilbermann. The film is a Post-Holocaust saga, although it opens with scenes in Auschwitz that are truly horrific. Hélène (Julie Depardieu) and Lily (Johanna ter Steege) were friends in Auschwitz, and they managed to survive the death march from Auschwitz to Louslau together. A third friend, Rose (Suzanne Clément) was unable to walk, so they were forced to leave her behind. As it turned out, Rose survived until the liberation of Auschwitz. The three did not see each other again until 1962, when they come together for a reunion at a beachside resort in Northern France. We learn early in the movie that Lily divorced her husband after the war, and is living as a "free soul," with no permanent partner. Hélène and Rose both married concentration camp survivors. The plot of the film--based on the lives of three actual friends--revolves around their interactions during the reunion. No matter how much ice cream they eat, and how they display their new bathing suits, thoughts keep circling back to Auschwitz. They quarrel about tiny details which they remember differently. They revive horrible memories. It's clear that the reunion will change their lives, but whether the change will be for the better or for the worse is an open question. For reasons I don't understand, "To Life" caries a terrible IMDb rating of 6.1. Fortunately, we saw it as part of the excellent Rochester Jewish Film Festival. If we hadn't had "All-Event" tickets, we probably would have stayed home. This is a movie to be seen, not missed. Ignore the rating and seek it out. It's available on DVD, and it will work well on the small screen. See it!
说实话这种欧美古装剧看多了就觉得食之无味弃之可惜，A大的身材还是很好的，全程看肌肉
是活下去，那反抗组织就是真相，而小黑就是谎言。
又是一部R级，略感肠胃不适。剧情逻辑有几处不大理解，但是再现了维京人曾经的生活场景，真实历史(比如划着海盗船去Rus劫掠斯拉夫人当作奴隶卖到Oleg的基辅土耳其和冰岛)里穿插有这个族群的原始信仰与神话，值得一看。以欧亚大陆另一端的脑回路我一直在想这些一千年前还在茹毛饮血的“野蛮人”是怎们变成现在的样子的，而公元895年那时已经开始印木版书籍纺织丝绢品茗吟诗的我们又怎样在一千年后退回到文蛤时那种野蛮无序的杀戮的。嗯，血性与奴性。这些小国王以力量取胜受民众推选，重视荣誉大于自己的生命，民众是自由人，不同于清时奴隶主子的君民关系。权力对于遵奉血性的族群意味着荣誉和力量，而对于屈膝于奴性的族群意味着利益和欲望。奴隶不是天生的，日耳曼人罗马人都当过彼此的奴隶。弱的时候思考着变强大，而不是满足于依附强大。又跑题了
Conan the Barbarian, Macbeth, Vinland Saga, Come and See, The Green Knight. 7/10, disappointed over all. 全片最大疑问，瓦尔基里为啥戴牙套？
“德拉古尔：不死者”
基本是北欧神话加上美国人对古代北欧的臆想，不尊重历史，毫无科学。。故事有结构，但没逻辑。
说实话这种欧美古装剧看多了就觉得食之无味弃之可惜，A大的身材还是很好的，全程看肌肉
用最复古从简的文法和最生猛彪悍的打戏合奏一首维京安魂曲。忘掉哈姆雷特，忘掉莎士比亚，在罗伯特艾格斯的电影语境里，影像才是征服观众的制胜法宝，长镜头调度很漂亮，工艺完成度双拉满。这是独立作者一次成功的商业试水，一场属于电影原教旨主义者的狂欢，一部专为大银幕而生的Cinema. 2022上半年最被低估的电影。品不出它的美，是种莫大的可惜。
拍成了PPT的样子，结果连最基本的故事都讲不好，有点神经病的气息，浪费了这强大的卡斯团
依旧是以异族风俗的「猎奇」来刺激观众日益饥渴的需求，在一种人造景观的夸张与「蜕化/退化」下，诸如此类终究会成为极端小圈子审美的盛宴。
看完有几个迷惑，第一个是这个片的成本为什么高达7000万？钱花哪里去了，看着还没有1000多万成本的绿衣骑士贵。第二是Eggers的灵气都去哪里了？前作里面大胆cult的元素和引人入胜的叙事都去哪里了，这个片里我看到的只是束手束脚和敷衍了事。PS，片长也有点太长，没有充沛的感情和充足的动机来支撑，显得片子又长又空洞。
Saul身体的美丽寓意着罪孽
神话类题材无感，除了画面较美和暴力展示以外看得怨
就跟大部分独立导演第一次拍大制作一样，风格突出，视听服化道讲究，剧本没意思有佳句无佳章，动作戏稀烂难看至极。
一个注定要去瓦尔哈拉的王子。
视觉上再标榜先锋也无法掩盖陈旧的猎奇内核。经历了去年的《钛》和今年的《未来罪行》，我开始害怕自己不够变态而与电影艺术格格不入了。
PS:好像理解了该片……又好像没理解😂😂😂但是要我去看什么解说又是万万不能的……所以就当自己看懂了吧，哈哈哈
随着年龄的增长 大卫柯南伯格对重口味和超出认知的追求越发强烈但又只存在于概念中 片中的器官与仪器充斥着60年代科幻恐怖片的元素 但在这个快消时代 没有人会停下来思考片头小男孩吃塑料的隐喻 没有人在乎故事之外的人性思考 只有故事本身在朦胧中表达的耐人寻味的感觉
真正的文化交流电影，本片试图去还原“王子复仇记”最原始的历史起源，但在创作过程中却也参考了很多后世根据这一历史改编创作出的其他作品。
竟然历史还原度这么高…感觉大家都是来看他裸体打斗的，我也是。Anya的口音真大可不必。björk这个出场也太短了吧，后面Walküre我都恍惚这是谁难道是aurora，她应该出现在这个电影里啊。well最该出现在这个电影里的还是Jóhann Jóhannsson吧。Kidman角色真是…但她演疯女人真好看！一刀到位就更棒了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
