Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
4.0。帶著5.9分的預期來看真的能看出很多驚喜，新世紀20s的剝削電影，一部電影的電影，在GRINDHOUSE後再一次對磨坊電影的反芻。
也许老年人才是最寂寞的吧。
拍色情片就好好拍色情片，拍slasher就好好拍slasher，不要搞什么剧情啊拔高啊真没劲……看完没感觉关注无性老年人，感觉是恶魔化老年人呢，反正这俩老变态给我恶心到了
高龄夫妻档杀人狂，杀起人来干净利落，成人片剧组不承想落入了恐怖片片场。老奶奶是年轻女演员所扮演，有坐地吸土那味。
剪辑有点意思，女主一人分饰年轻演员和杀人狂老太两角也是有想法的。
a24现在确实是质感的代名词了，整片的概念还是有点意思的，但还不够惊艳
整个人从头到脚都在emo。
老年人性爱也没什么猎奇的，就是很普通的猎杀片
失望。剪辑频繁炫技，但仍跳不出毫无进展的文本，人物无脑行为逻辑就已经令人咂舌。再说回文本，将性色附身于砍杀已不是新鲜事，逐个砍杀过程更是没劲之极，像极了垂老之人的苟延残喘，只会更进一步感叹人物行动逻辑太蠢。砍杀核心仍是不洁，但垂老肉体的引入是想引起反应强烈的生理不适。幸存之女的最后那段互文，画蛇添足。总结：在无法文本深入的情况下，视听并没有改进，无数概念导向德州电锯杀人狂，却不得不说是一次浅显而没劲的模仿秀！
从表演和镜头语言到插曲全都俗不可耐，结果end credit一出看到执行制片有某Levinson，不好意思是我没搞清楚状况才会想要看这片的
挺不错的。节奏把握的好，jump scare 也恰到好处。为近几年的老人恐怖片挖掘了新内容。很期待看老人吸食年轻人精气肉体鲜血的。。。
复古气质挺到位的，剧情太闹着玩儿了。就像剧中主角们想拍有电影质感的A片一样，导演拍了一部稍有质感的B级片吧。
依旧是一部杀疯了的恐怖片。片中片照应的故事，作为一个对色情片有追求的导演，把后半段拍成恐怖片也很合理吧......郊外租房，行为怪异的人这种老套的故事，床震那段笑死了。
因为杀人狂是老人的缘故吗？节奏是一种诡异的慢。血腥场面非常乏味，反倒是白天的几个日常画面挺好看，模仿古早欧洲文艺片情调。导演估计想另辟蹊径来着，题材也挺深刻，就是老人的岁数太大了，走路都打颤的身子骨就算还有性欲，也绝对没体力杀那么多人。总体不好看。
哦，不要轻视老年群体的生理需求。看了cast之后突然觉得有点意思了！期待一下前传吧！
不算无聊，但也不是很有意思。
高龄夫妻档杀人狂，杀起人来干净利落，成人片剧组不承想落入了恐怖片片场。老奶奶是年轻女演员所扮演，有坐地吸土那味。
独特的构图美学和惊艳的蒙太奇勾起了我解读暗线的欲望。但是故事太烂了。
#22#35 半部情色半部惊悚，中间转换时还送了一部优秀的文艺MV。爆米花表示十分满足。近年来少有的不拖泥带水不故弄玄虚不脑残的优秀恐怖片…话说小妹子想拍片前蠢蠢欲动的样子真的特别迷人
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
