Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
希娜才是第一主角。夜魔侠版飓风营救，好久没看到这么爽的电影了，竟然是部网大，属于超英电影了！
各种塑料普通话非常丰富，包括川普，上普，东普，台普以及不知道哪里的普，总之只需要听不同的普通话口音就可以分辨角色了，非常贴心的考虑到了视障人士的观影需求
虽然没太大的惊喜，毕竟这类电影太多了，但还是觉得挺不错，算是烧过钱的电影。
编剧: 林老狗
1.5
故事挺老套的，但是耐不住甜甜圈真的好可爱啊，哈哈
一部非常看好的动画片，简直太可爱了，两只长得像甜甜圈叫做菲拉萌意外通过时空隧道穿越到未来，拯救种族的故事。动画片的想象力太丰富了，可爱的小动物穿越到不同时代和国家，很有中国元素，还可以了解历史和地理，在娱乐中增长知识，最后的结局也很温馨，太适合小朋友观看了！
所以是觉得小朋友听得懂英语还是觉得小朋友能一边看剧情一边看字幕？
设定可以，但是故事有BUG，女主表演加一星
孩子原本是不愿去看的，结果看得很开心😃
第一次知道这部电影是在一个公众号的宣传中，当天心情不好，加上最近迷上了动漫电影，当时看完推荐以后就感觉心里暖暖的，感觉是一部轻松美好带点可爱的电影，就像埋下了就一颗种子，今天终于看完了，说说自己的感受，故事情节非常简单，没有隐喻，内容比较正能量，人物形象也很可爱，通过这部电影可以了解到一些已经灭绝的稀缺物种，一些历史性的代表物，比较适合七八岁的小女孩看，从电影本身来说，我认为音乐，台词，拍摄，画面转场，剪辑等都处于一个中等的水平
两分就是给女主的，国产科幻片夜魔侠，细节没法看，剧情节奏还行，但是逻辑还是有不少洞的，被网传评分骗了…估计都是夸女主的，男主演技还行，但是真的这电影不太行。
语言: 汉语普通话
居然把叨叨认成了华波波，变态女一号出彩一些，感觉一些网大还是挺好看的。
一个动画片，翻译台词差劲，而且语速太快，少年不惜的看，儿童跟不上节奏，一顿尬聊。而且剧情中有一个故意结巴的镜头，孩子看了以后就开始学，后来看了一半赶快走了。
不错，好电影！男女主好像段奕宏和辛芷蕾……但是演出了自己的风格，虽然我是因为叨叨才来看这部电影的😂
没想到最抢眼的是女一号“疯婆子”，安志杰都被盖住了，小丑女+杀死比尔附体，这一路杀得很爽。
还好的甜甜圈很萌又新奇，最可爱的反派小狗狗也个小戏精。小恐龙也超级可爱，还有一些小贱的笑点
[视]洋人长官，洋人主持，校园不正当竞争，无德贵族学生，燥怒市民，全国最不文明城市，人口贩卖<飓风营救>，几个网红脸男配，算命老太。邪版辛芷蕾，新疆版沈腾，爆炸头吴军。伪乱伦，国内方言，阿雅颜不俗，父爱对比，重复闪回，配乐一般，血雾还行，女儿尴尬。绳索与棍棒<死亡搁浅>
目前评分5.5比较符合，剧情大致没问题，各演员演技在线，安志杰挑大梁也挑起来了，打戏不错，但是具体细节经不住抠，打戏的配乐是直接抓轨美国片的预告片么？这部片不行，锅可不能让安志杰背
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
