Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
Oh.. O.. O.. Ok. Then. 另外还挺喜欢月球的这个内核，巨大的机械物体很迷人。另外，远离海岸线，生活在内陆城市不会在一开始就要面临海啸什么的……靠近地球的Moon其实很好看就是。。Gravity is magic.
前半段灾难片，后半段居然是科幻片...艾默里奇也就这几板斧了，山崩地裂凡人英雄平行剪辑，十几年前觉得新鲜，现在再看过时感、套路感非常明显，看一个镜头就知道下一个镜头要拍啥。现在人家都玩《不要抬头》了，把你这套东西颠覆了。开始一定是个疯疯癫癫的科学家先发现末日征兆，但没人信他，最后也一定是几个人组成的英雄小分队拯救地球。地球都要毁灭了，英雄还要随时跟家人联络，家人还要斗劫匪，并不想看这些节外生枝好吗。崩裂特效现在也已经是特效鄙视链末端了。至于后面的科幻部分，就完全是在瞎编了。华谊参投，不知道中方对内容提要求没有，反正塞了一位中国女演员，中国还为拯救世界贡献了月球车技术…= =
依旧是罗兰·艾默里奇的灾难风格，人类造物主那里有点扯，灾难场面很刺激，很久没看到过这么经典设定的灾难片了
《Moon Fall》我可以说，中美合拍片，就不可能拍出好的片子吗？如果再把这个范围设定得再小一些，应该会成立，就是所谓的商业电影，主流大片，因为文化的冲突在这里摆着，中国人如果是投资的大头，那更是灾害级别的
爆炸贝都开始致敬自己了，我们可能真的都老了吧…
不能原谅漫威式搞笑。怎的，好莱坞电影无论类型现在都流行时不时来一句段子？严重影响观感。尽管长达两小时，电影的节奏仍显跳脱，还存在大段废片。还不如smart一点聚焦于特效&灾难&动作&展开后的世界观（还蛮新颖的，在电影里。）可惜。不过还是有一些真诚之处，勉强给个三星吧。
其实我觉得还行，不至于这么低啊...月球内部的结构也是让我叹为观止
我只能说，CG做的非常好看，建议下次不要再拍了。
挺爽的 结局也不错 很多东西可太现实了 两人感情刻画的也很好，就是电影院那个1080放那么大的屏幕，太糊了hhh，最开始那一段骑车突突突的那一段，特别震撼，然后后面几个小反转也挺有意思，大晚上看的挺爽的。
确实非常难看的一部作品，迈克尔.贝再次突破了下限。无人机翻转运镜搞得人眼花缭乱，剧情真的让人崩溃，两个小时讲了一堆烂的不能再烂的毫无逻辑可言的GTA警匪追车大战，看得我都快被救护车带走了🚑
理论过于疯狂，等于是抛弃了常识，凭空虚构，地球不是人类的起源，月球是个巨型结构体，是人类祖先保存火种的最后防御，人工智能要把人类赶尽杀绝，信息过于庞杂，现实被无情推翻，KC听着哈珀的解释一脸懵，观众直接就懵到冒烟儿了。
疫情期间可看的不多，还是给女票看困了。预告片看完基本剧情就都知道了。对话过多，推动情节乏力，手持拍摄镜头过多……emm是不是应该看精灵旅社4来着
迈克尔贝依旧让剧中人哔哔个不停，极度让人神烦！
也许是想到今年自己即将发表的第一篇论文写的是这位陪我长大的导演，也许是在众人贬斥的好莱坞制作中再次看到迈克尔·贝默默坚持的作者创作，也许本来就是故事很精彩。
还是俗了，世界末日场面与逼真视效挺震撼，宏大的宇宙观也眼前一亮，简直就像在看一部1990s好莱坞标配版科幻大片，只可惜时代已经变了，观众并不满足于炫目的特效与星战场景，硬核走心的剧本，与众不同的创意与精彩的表演才是王道啊（参考《星际穿越》），而这恰恰是本片最稀缺的！且不说拯救地球的俗套剧情与千篇一律的稀烂人设令人昏昏欲睡审美疲劳，诸多bug也说不过去（月球原是人类远祖的“诺亚方舟”？无比凶猛的AI技术竟以一个胖子的自我牺牲而终结？），穿插的Chinese元素也显得生硬尴尬……而且，曾经佳作不断的罗兰.艾默里奇现在竟然沦落到以《流浪地球》为行业标杆的地步了么？真得悠着点。
1.5 Childish kids playing with CGI toys. At least they are not stupid enough to blow up the new World Trade Center. Seriously they should have stopped him ten years ago . Who let him do it again? Oh Chinese money. Fine, don’t look up and keep your head down.
降智😅 地震把一屋子领导砸死了我属实没想到
2.5星 都2022年了 我没想到居然还有拍抢银行的电影 无人机镜头太多了吧也
另外加拿大人于文文的角色在美国人心里就是一个保姆啊
不过是白嫖的，多一星
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
